Psychology Critical Review Brief: Siddals, Torous and Coxon (2024) Generative AI Chatbots and Mental Health
| Subject | Psychology (university level, Ireland) |
| Article for Review | Siddals, S., Torous, J. and Coxon, A. (2024), a qualitative study of people’s experiences of using generative AI chatbots for mental health support (9 pages) |
| Assessment | Part 1: Critical review paper (1,500 words); Part 2: Reflective writing (1,000 words) |
| Referencing | APA 7th edition |
Students taking this university psychology module in Ireland are given a single empirical article, Siddals, Torous and Coxon (2024), which explores how people use generative AI chatbots such as ChatGPT for emotional and mental health support. The task has two separate pieces: a 1,500-word critical review judged against a weighted rubric, and a 1,000-word reflective essay, both referenced in APA 7th edition.
Part 1: Critical Review (1,500 words)
Write a critical review of the assigned article. The review is marked against the following criteria:
| Criterion | What to cover | Marks |
| Introduction | Identify the purpose of the article (aims/objectives); identify the variables and evaluate the hypothesis (if any); outline the main points. | 10 |
| Methods | Identify the methodological approach and design; describe the participants, sampling methodology and data collection techniques; evaluate the validity of the research (the extent to which the instrument or method measured what it intended to measure); identify any shortcomings in the methods. | 10 |
| Results | Critically evaluate the presentation of the data; identify whether all the data described in the method is presented in the results (or is conspicuous in its absence); evaluate whether the data is likely to be reliable, i.e. whether the instruments or methods would produce consistent results. | 20 |
| Interpretation and Analysis | Interpret and analyse what you understand about the results; identify the most important, interesting or useful aspect of the results; evaluate the strength of the authors’ argument and how well the data supports the conclusions; identify the strong points of the article; consider how the findings can be explained and how they compare with existing information in the area. | 40 |
| Conclusion | What you learned from the results and how they add to or extend existing knowledge; whether this is high-quality research and a valuable article, and why; how the findings could be applied in potential future research. | 10 |
| Academic Writing | Consistent and accurate APA referencing; correct spelling and grammar; formal academic style. | 10 |
Part 2: Reflective Writing (1,000 words)
Write a reflective piece connected to the article and your own learning. The reflective writing rubric (five criteria worth 40, 20, 20, 10 and 10 marks) was only partly visible in the copy supplied, so check the full criteria and learning outcomes in your module handbook before you start.
Get Expert Help with Your Psychology Critical Review
The weighting tells you where to spend your words: the results (20 marks) and interpretation and analysis (40 marks) sections are worth more than the introduction, methods, conclusion and writing combined. Rather than retelling what participants said about chatbots, assess how the sample was recruited, whether interview data and thematic analysis can carry the authors’ conclusions, what the paper leaves out about risk and safety, and how its findings compare with earlier work on digital mental health apps. Keep the reflection personal and specific to what the article changed in your thinking.
Our research paper critique writing service can guide you on structuring the review and APA 7 referencing, and our help to write my reflective essay supports the second part. You can also look at the PSY1061 psychology continuous assessment or the Research in Practice 1 research critique brief. Students at other Irish universities also use our assignment help Ireland service for their wider psychology modules.
- 5N1786 Special Needs Assisting Project: Research a Diagnosed Additional Need (QQI Level 5)
- SP3195 Social Movements Concept Map and Analytical Commentary Brief 2026 – University of Galway
- Forecasting and Scheduling Assignment 1: Pizzamatic OEE Calculation and Capacity Management | UL Kemmy Business School
- SNA Learner Record Reflective Journal Brief (10 Entries) – QQI Special Needs Assisting
- 6N1957 Special Needs Assisting Case Study Assessment (40%) QQI Level 6 2026
Get Free Assignment Quotes
