6N4329 Supervisory Management QQI Level 6 Project
Assessment Brief: Project
- Component Title and Code: Supervisory Management 6N4329
- Level: QQI Level 6
- Assessment Technique: Project (40%)
- Learning Outcomes Assessed: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
- Submission Date: Friday 23rd October 23:59pm
Purpose of this module
The purpose of this module is to equip learners with the knowledge, skills, and competence to work independently in a supervisory capacity across various industries. During this module learners will gain a comprehensive understanding of supervisory management, including key responsibilities, adherence to policies, and maintaining industry standards. The module covers workplace supervision, staff conduct, and professional relationships, ensuring compliance with best practices. Upon completion, learners will be equipped with the competencies required to supervise, manage, and develop teams effectively, ensuring operational efficiency and staff well-being in various work environments.
Minimum Intended Module Learning Outcomes (MIMLOs)
- Describe the main duties and responsibilities of a supervisory manager referring to relevant policies and services in a chosen vocational or work environment.
- Examine how current industry standards, guidelines and practices influence the work environment, supervision, staff conduct and staff relations.
- Identify the steps required to effectively recruit staff, including pre-planning, sourcing, screening and evaluating methods.
- Develop procedures for work-related activities, including communication, service standards, staff recruitment and criteria for supervisory procedures.
- Prepare a system for maintaining work-related records and a budget to include planned and contingency spending.
- Apply effective training methods to train staff under the current industry standards using suitable aids and materials during a training session.
- Develop staff evaluations that measure objectives, provide feedback, and identify person development opportunities.
The Assessment Format and Guidelines for Submission
Format
This project requires learners to demonstrate their understanding of supervisory management through the application of key concepts to a chosen healthcare workplace scenario. Learners must produce a structured written report that addresses the core responsibilities of a supervisory manager, including compliance with organisational policies, industry standards, staff recruitment, workplace procedures, financial management, staff training, and performance evaluation processes.
Word count for the written report is: 1500 words (excluding references).
In addition to the written report, learners are required to submit three short video recordings (maximum 7 minutes each). These videos are designed to assess the learner’s ability to explain, apply, and justify key decisions in a real or realistic workplace context. The video component should demonstrate clear understanding, practical application, and the learner’s own voice and reasoning, rather than repeating the written content.
Learners must also submit practical supporting artefacts as part of their project. These include:
- A sample budget, demonstrating financial planning and contingency considerations
- A staff evaluation form, designed to support performance management and staff development
These artefacts must be clearly linked to the chosen organisation or scenario and referenced within the main body of the report and included in the Appendices. The sample budget form is Appendix 1. The staff evaluation form is Appendix 2.
All work must be appropriately referenced using the Harvard Referencing system. Learners should refer to the Harvard Referencing Guidelines available in the Student Success module on Moodle for guidance on the correct use of in-text citations and the compilation of a bibliography.
Each submission must include:
- A cover page
- A signed authorship statement
- A table of contents
- The main body of work
- A reference list (bibliography)
- Appendices (including the required artefacts)
- The Video submissions uploaded to Moodle
The report should be presented using either Times New Roman or Arial font, size 12, with 1.5 line spacing. This assessment is designed to meet the following learning outcomes: MIMLO 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.
All components of the project, including the written report, video submissions, and supporting artefacts, must be uploaded to Moodle.
Further information regarding the Video submission expectations and professionalism requirements will be uploading to Moodle within the assignment section.
Project Instructions and Performance Criteria
Introduction and Background Information (5 Marks)
Written Component (5 marks):
- Define supervisory management and its significance in a work environment
- Clearly describe the duties and responsibilities of a supervisory manager in your chosen vocational/work environment, including relevant policies and services
- Identify key organisational challenges (e.g. staff conduct, communication, budgeting, training)
- Outline the objectives of the report
Supervisory Responsibilities and Industry Standards (15 Marks)
Written Component (15 marks):
- Analyse the core responsibilities of a supervisory manager and their alignment with industry standards (8 marks)
- Examine how industry standards, guidelines, and best practice influence supervision, staff conduct, and relationships (7 marks)
Video 1: Organisation, Industry Standards and Supervisory Procedures (10 marks)
Learners must:
- Introduce their chosen organisation (real or realistic scenario)
- Describe the role of a supervisory manager in this context
- Identify relevant industry standards, policies, or guidelines
- Explain how these standards influence supervisory practice and decision-making
Staff Recruitment Process and Workforce Planning (10 Marks)
Written Component (10 marks):
- Identify steps required to effectively recruit staff (pre-planning, sourcing, screening, evaluation) (5 marks)
- Discuss recruitment challenges and strategies to improve retention (5 marks)
Operational and Procedural Management (10 Marks)
Written Component (10 marks)
- Develop clear, step-by-step procedures for communication, service standards, staff recruitment, and supervisory practices within a healthcare setting (5 marks)
- Outline the system for maintaining work-related records, including how records are completed, stored, accessed, and protected (confidentiality). (5 marks)
Prepare a Sample Budget (Appendix 1) (5 marks)
Develop a simple budget which demonstrates how financial resources are planned and managed within a healthcare/community setting.
The budget must:
- Include planned expenditure
- Include contingency expenditure for unexpected costs
- Be presented in a clear and structured format
- Demonstrate an understanding of financial planning and responsibility
Video 2: Operational Application and Financial Decision-Making (10 marks)
Learners must:
- Explain one procedure they developed (e.g. communication or service standard)
- Describe how this procedure would work in practice
- Explain key decisions made in their budget
- Demonstrate understanding of the importance of financial planning, prioritisation, and contingency spending.
Staff Training and Development (10 Marks)
Written Component (10 marks):
- Apply appropriate training methods using suitable aids and materials (5 marks)
- Discuss strategies for ongoing staff development aligned with industry standards (5 marks)
Staff Evaluation and Performance Management (5 Marks)
- Outline at least two strategies a supervisor would use to improve staff performance
- Explain how these strategies would be implemented in a real workplace situation
- Suggest practical actions to help staff improve and develop their skills.
Staff Evaluation Form (Appendix 2) (5 marks)
Learners must develop a staff evaluation form which demonstrates how staff performance is measured and reviewed.
The form must:
- Include performance criteria linked to clear objectives
- Use an appropriate rating/measurement system
- Provide a structured feedback section
- Include development/action planning opportunities
Video 3: Training, Evaluation and Leadership Practice (10 marks)
Learners must:
- Explain how they would deliver a training session
- Describe how they would support ongoing staff development
- Explain how their staff evaluation form would be used in practice
- Describe how they would give feedback or manage a performance issue
Conclusions and Recommendations (5 Marks)
Written Component (5 marks):
- Summarise key findings and provide recommendations (3 marks)
- Reflect on the importance of leadership and supervisory skills in practice (2 marks)
Video Performance Criteria
Video 1: Organisation, Industry Standards and Supervisory Procedures (10 marks) (Max: 7 Minutes)
- Introduce the organisation and briefly explain the type of service and who it supports (1 minute)
- Describe the role of the supervisory manager and the outline key responsibilities of the supervisor in the organisation (2 minutes)
- Identify relevant standards (e.g. HIQA, health & safety, safeguarding) and briefly explain each one (2 minutes)
- Explain how these standards influence: Decision-making: Staff management: Quality and safety of care and reinforce the importance of standards in practice (2 minutes)
Video 2: Operational Application and Financial Decision-Making (10 marks) (Max: 7 minutes)
- Explain one procedure they developed (1 minutes)
- Describe how this procedure would work in practice (2 minutes)
- Explain key decisions made in their budget (2 minutes)
- Demonstrate understanding of the importance of financial planning, prioritisation, and contingency spending. (2 minutes)
Video 3: Training, Evaluation and Leadership Practice (10 marks) (Max: 7 minutes)
- Explain how they would deliver a training session (2 minutes)
- Describe how they would support ongoing staff development (1 minute)
- Explain how their staff evaluation form would be used in practice (2 minutes)
- Describe how they would give feedback or manage a performance issue (2 minutes)
Detailed Marking Sheet
Overall Marking System
- Distinction: 80% – 100%
- Merit: 65% – 79%
- Pass: 50% – 64%
- Unsuccessful 0 – 49%
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION (5 MARKS)
Overview of the Supervisory Role: Define Supervisory management and its significance in a work environment. Clearly describe the duties and responsibilities of a supervisory manager in your chosen vocational or work environment. (Include relevant policies and services that guide these duties) Identify the key challenges organization (5 marks)
| Excellent (5) | Very good (4) | Average (3) | Weak (2) | Unsuccessful (0-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive description with thorough understanding of the role and clear link to relevant policies and services. | Detailed description with a very good link to policies and services. Minor gaps in detail. | Good description of supervisory role but lacks clarity or some linkages to policies and services. | Adequate description, limited understanding of role and missing policies/services. | Little to no description of supervisory role, lack of relevant details. |
SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITIES AND INDUSTRY STANDARDS (15 MARKS)
Analysis of Supervisory Duties (8 marks): Examine the core responsibilities of a supervisory manager and their alignment with industry standards.
| Excellent (8) | Very good (6-7) | Average (5) | Weak (3-4) | Unsuccessful (0-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong analysis, comprehensive understanding of duties, well-supported alignment with industry standards | Very Good analysis, minor gaps in connection to industry standards. | Adequate analysis but lacks depth in connecting to industry standards | Limited understanding of supervisory duties and alignment with standards. | Little to no analysis, lacks understanding of supervisory duties or industry standards. |
Impact of Industry Guidelines (7 marks): Examine how industry standards, guidelines, and best practices influence the work environment.
| Excellent (7) | Very good (6) | Average (4-5) | Weak (3) | Unsuccessful (0-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong critical evaluation with clear examples illustrating impact. | Very good evaluation, minor gaps in examples or depth. | Sufficient evaluation but lacks depth or breadth. | Limited evaluation lacks examples or depth. | Little to no evaluation, lacks understanding of guidelines’ impact |
Video 1: Organisation, Industry Standards and Supervisory Procedures (10 marks)
| Excellent (10) | Very good (8-9) | Average (6-7) | Weak (4-5) | Unsuccessful (0-3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent introduction to a realistic organisation in a professional manner, accurately describes the supervisory manager’s role, identifies relevant industry standards/policies, and explains how these influence supervisory practice and decision-making. | Very good introduction to a realistic organisation in a professional manner, accurately describes the supervisory manager’s role, identifies relevant industry standards/policies, and explains how these influence supervisory practice and decision-making | Introduces an organisation and outlines the supervisory role, with some reference to standards/policies and limited explanation of their impact on practice. | Basic or unclear introduction of an organisation, limited description of the supervisory role, and minimal or inaccurate reference to standards/policies | Fails to clearly introduce an organisation, does not describe the supervisory role adequately, and shows little or no understanding of relevant standards or their influence. |
Staff Recruitment Process and Workforce Planning (10 Marks)
Apply appropriate training methods using suitable aids and materials (5 marks)
| Excellent (5) | Very good (4) | Average (3) | Weak (2) | Unsuccessful (0-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comprehensively identifies all key recruitment steps (pre-planning, sourcing, screening, evaluation) | Very good identification of recruitment steps. | Identifies main recruitment steps with some detail. | Limited identification of recruitment steps | Fails to identify key recruitment steps and shows. |
Discuss recruitment challenges and strategies to improve retention (5 marks)
| Excellent (5) | Very good (4) | Average (3) | Weak (2) | Unsuccessful (0-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provides a clear, insightful discussion of recruitment challenges with effective, well-justified retention strategies. | Provides a very good discussion of recruitment challenges with relevant retention strategies | Provides a good discussion of challenges and retention strategies. | Basic or unclear discussion of challenges, with minimal reference | Little or no understanding of recruitment challenges or retention strategies |
Operational and Procedural Management (10 marks)
Develop clear, step-by-step procedures for communication, service standards, staff recruitment, and supervisory practices within a healthcare setting (5 marks)
| Excellent (5) | Very Good (4) | Average (3) | Weak (2) | Unsuccessful (0-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Well-developed procedure, clear, actionable steps that address procedures. | Very good procedure with minor gaps in clarity or detail. | Adequate procedure but lacks depth or detail. | Limited procedure lacks clarity or feasibility. | No procedure or vague, impractical steps |
Outline the system for maintaining work-related records, including how records are completed, stored, accessed, and protected (confidentiality) (5 marks)
| Excellent (5) | Very Good (4) | Average (3) | Weak (2) | Unsuccessful (0-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent and detailed outline of system for maintaining work-related records. | Very good outline of system for maintaining work-related records. | Adequate outline of system for maintaining work-related records. | Basic outline of system for maintaining work-related records. | No system for maintaining work-related records included |
Prepare a Sample Budget (Appendix 1) (5 marks)
| Excellent (5) | Very Good (4) | Average (3) | Weak (2) | Unsuccessful (0-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Develops a clear, well-structured budget including planned and contingency expenditure, demonstrating a strong understanding of financial planning and responsible resource management in a healthcare/community setting. | Develops a well-organised budget including planned and contingency costs, showing a good understanding of financial planning and resource management | Presents a basic budget with planned expenditure and some reference to contingency costs, showing a reasonable understanding of financial planning. | Presents an unclear or incomplete budget with limited detail on planned or contingency expenditure and a weak understanding of financial planning. | Fails to present a clear budget, with little or no inclusion of planned or contingency expenditure and minimal understanding of financial planning. |
Video 2: Operational Application and Financial Decision-Making (10 marks)
| Excellent (10) | Very Good (8-9) | Average (6-7) | Weak (4-5) | Unsuccessful (0-3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clearly explains a well-developed procedure and how it operates in practice, provides strong justification for key budget decisions, and demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of financial planning, prioritisation, and contingency spending. | Clearly explains the procedure and its practical application, outlines key budget decisions, and shows a good understanding of financial planning and contingency use. | Explains the procedure with some detail and describes its use in practice, with some reference to budget decisions and a reasonable understanding of financial planning or contingency use. | Provides a limited or unclear explanation of the procedure and its application, with minimal discussion of budget decisions and a weak understanding of financial planning. | Fails to clearly explain the procedure or its application, with little or no reference to budget decisions and minimal understanding of financial planning. |
Staff Training and Development (10 Marks)
Apply appropriate training methods using suitable aids and materials (5 marks)
| Excellent (5) | Very Good (4) | Average (3) | Weak (2) | Unsuccessful (0-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applies highly appropriate training methods with effective and well-chosen aids and materials, demonstrating strong understanding of how to support learning. | Applies suitable training methods with effective use of appropriate aids and materials. | Applies basic training methods with some appropriate use of aids and materials | Limited or inconsistent use of training methods, with minimal or unsuitable aids and materials. | Fails to apply appropriate training methods or use suitable aids and materials. |
Discuss strategies for ongoing staff development aligned with industry standards (5 marks)
| Excellent (5) | Very good (5) | Average (3) | Weak (2) | Unsuccessful (0-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provides a clear, comprehensive and insightful discussion of effective staff development strategies, fully aligned with relevant industry standards. | Provides a clear discussion of appropriate staff development strategies aligned with industry standards. | Provides a general discussion of staff development strategies with some reference to industry standards. | Provides a limited or unclear discussion of staff development strategies with minimal reference to industry standards. | Fails to discuss appropriate staff development strategies or show awareness of industry standards. |
Staff Evaluation and Performance Management (5 Marks)
Outline at least two strategies a supervisor would use to improve staff performance. Explain how these strategies would be implemented in a real workplace situation and suggest practical actions to help staff improve and develop their skills.
| Excellent (5) | Very Good (4) | Average (3) | Weak (2) | Unsuccessful (0-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clearly outlines at least two effective strategies to improve staff performance, provides detailed and realistic explanations of their implementation, and suggests practical, well-justified actions to support staff development. | Outlines two appropriate strategies, explains how they would be implemented in practice, and suggests relevant actions to support staff improvement. | Outlines two strategies with some explanation of implementation and provides basic suggestions for staff development. | Identifies limited or unclear strategies with minimal explanation of implementation and few practical actions | Fails to outline appropriate strategies, with little or no explanation of implementation or actions to support staff development. |
Staff Evaluation Form (Appendix 2) (5 marks)
| Excellent (5) | Very Good (4) | Average (3) | Weak (2) | Unsuccessful (0-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Includes clear performance criteria linked to specific objectives, uses an appropriate and consistent rating system, provides a well-structured feedback section, and incorporates meaningful development/action planning opportunities. | Includes clear performance criteria and objectives, uses an appropriate rating system, provides a structured feedback section, and includes relevant development planning. | Includes performance criteria with some link to objectives, uses a basic rating system, and provides a general feedback section with some development planning. | Limited or unclear performance criteria, weak or inconsistent rating system, and minimal feedback or development planning. | Fails to include clear performance criteria, lacks an appropriate rating system, and provides little or no feedback or development planning. |
Video 3: Training, Evaluation and Leadership Practice (10 marks)
| Excellent (10) | Very Good (8-9) | Average (6-7) | Weak (4-5) | Unsuccessful (0-3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clearly explains how a training session would be delivered, provides detailed descriptions of supporting ongoing staff development, explains effectively how the evaluation form would be used in practice, and demonstrates strong approaches to giving feedback and managing performance issues. | Clearly explains training delivery and staff development support, outlines how the evaluation form would be used, and describes appropriate methods for feedback and managing performance issues. | Explains training delivery and staff development with some detail, gives a general explanation of the evaluation form use, and outlines basic approaches to feedback and performance management. | Provides limited or unclear explanations of training delivery and staff development, with minimal reference to evaluation form use and feedback or performance management. | Fails to clearly explain training delivery or staff development, with little or no understanding of evaluation form use or managing performance issues. |
Conclusions and Recommendations (5 Marks)
| Excellent (5) | Very Good (4) | Average (3) | Weak (2) | Unsuccessful (0-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provides a clear and concise summary of key findings with well-justified recommendations and offers a thoughtful reflection demonstrating strong insight into the importance of leadership and supervisory skills in practice. | Summarises key findings and provides relevant recommendations, with a clear reflection on the importance of leadership and supervisory skills. | Provides a basic summary of findings with some recommendations, and a general reflection on leadership and supervisory skills. | Limited or unclear summary of findings with minimal recommendations, and a weak reflection on leadership and supervisory skills. | Fails to summarise key findings or provide meaningful recommendations, with little or no reflection on leadership or supervisory |
- 6N4329 Supervisory Management QQI Level 6 Project: Report, Videos, Budget and Staff Evaluation Form
- NU4057 Recovery – Working with Vulnerable Populations Assignment Brief 2026
- Business Continuity Project Management Assignment 1, 2026 | SETU
- Waterford Fire Service Business Continuity Assignment Brief 2026 | SETU
- NURS203 The Recovery of Health in Specialist Care Settings Assessment Brief 2026
Get Free Assignment Quotes
