| 6.3.2a Assessment Brief/Cover Sheet | |||
| HADVP | |||
| Majella Bunce | |||
| Boundary Management 6N2207 | |||
| Assignment | Weighting: | 50% | |
| Case Study Brief | |||
| 11th November 2025 | Submission Date: | 12th January 2026 | |
| LO 6,4,20,14,18,8,19,25,12,10,22,23,24 | |||
Permitted
AI permitted for review of grammar, spelling and sentence structure only.
Recommended Word Count 2,000 excluding references.
Comprehensive assessment of organisational operations/activities . 20 marks
Clear understanding of the theoretical underpinning/justifications of the strategies/actions suggested. 20 marks
Comprehensive short term and long term solutions provided. 30 marks.
Critical reflection and evaluation of own personal effectiveness. 20 marks
Thorough evaluation of personal learning gained. 10 marks
Assessments will not be accepted without this coversheet.
Plagiarism is the presentation of someone else’s ideas, arguments, concepts or work as your own by failing to reference or acknowledge it properly. All such work must be acknowledged.
Any learner, who presents another’s work as their own, will be investigated in line with Cork ETB Assessment Malpractice procedures and may be awarded a zero grade.
Learners should keep copies of all assessment submitted, where applicable
The ETHICAL use of Generative AI tools is permitted for specific functions within this assessment. These tools may be utilised for the following:
However, the use of Generative AI is strictly prohibited for:
Setting is a residential centre for adults with learning challenges.
The parents of Paul, who has a learning challenge , are unable to care for him at home any longer because of their age. They wish to ensure Paul gets the care he needs as a permanent resident in the centre.
However, they are concerned about the upset they will cause Paul if they tell him that his stay in the centre is permanent and that he will not be coming home again except perhaps for the occasional visit. To avoid upsetting Paul, they have already explained to him that his stay in the centre is temporary and that he will be returning home when renovations are complete, eventhough this is not true.
They ask the healthcare worker to go along with the explanation they have given Paul. They add that because of his learning challenges it is unlikely it will register with him over time and that there must be another reason why he is not going home.
They advise you that if he knows he will not be coming home, then it is likely he will become emotionally volatile. He may inflict harm on himself or strike out at staff or other residents. They also fear he may withdraw into himself and never experience well being again
Question 1 Learning Outcome 6
Define the concepts of Ethics and Confidentiality.
2 marks.
Question 2 Learning Outcome 6
Describe and explain 3 ethical behaviours/issues relevant to the healthcare worker in this workplace situation for example, use and abuse of power, duty of care etc.
3 x 1 marks
Question 3 Learning Outcome 4
Identify 2 boundaries that are crossed in this scenario.
2 x 1 marks
Question 4 Learning Outcome 4
Explain 3 potential effects of blurred boundaries on the worker and the client for example, loss of trust.
3x 1 marks
Question 5 Learning Outcome: 20
Discuss 2 reasons why it is important for healthcare workers to establish clear roles and expectations in this setting with the parents for example, unrealistic expectations, role confusion, damage to the client etc.
2 x 2.5 marks
Question 6 Learning Outcome: 14
Discuss the following 3 cultural variations in the use and interpretation of the roles and expectations in Question 5 in this setting:
3 x 1 marks
Question 7 Learning Outcome :18
Outline specific limitations in relation to confidentiality (suicide ideation, allegations of abuse etc.)
5 marks
Michelle is a child care worker and works in a community care child protection team. She works alongside healthcare and other social welfare professional.
She finds team meetings very stressful as the team members often have such different perspectives on cases. Frequently she feels that she is not heard simply because she is not a child’s social worker/healthcare worker or a GP, eventhough she has spent more time with the child than others at the meeting. Sometimes she thinks ‘What’s the point of me saying anything, they will decide anyway’.
Often Michelle feels members of the team fall into regular alliances siding with the same people on different issues, and not giving due regard to the perspectives of others on cases discussed. She also finds it hard to hold different views from those of her colleagues with whom she works closely with. Michelle feels that they think she is letting them down if she disagrees with them in front of others.
It can also be unclear at times where one person’s responsibility with a case starts and finishes. Sometimes entire meetings revolve around whose responsibility certain actions are and who knows best, which can make meetings very tense and heated. Michelle is aware how much influence is exerted upon any professional both by the other professional and by the working relationships with the family members.
Question 8 Learning Outcome: 8
Explain the different levels of confidentiality between team members, between one professional and another and between staff and client in this scenario under the following headings:
| Absolute Confidentiality: |
| Relative Confidentiality: |
| 2 x 1 marks |
Question 10 Learning Outcome:25
Identify practices that impede effective teamwork in scenario 2 e.g power imbalance, lack of cohesion, lack of shared values etc.
5 x 1 marks
Question 11 Learning Outcome: 12
Describe the roles of two persons external to the organisation and the appropriate utilisation of their skills and expertise. In relation to teamwork in the above scenario.
| Person 1: |
| Person 2: |
| 2 x 1 Marks |
Explain the knowledge and information that these professionals might add to the above scenario.
1 mark
Question 12 Learning Outcome:10
Explain the value of teamwork and how it supports members in achieving clear goals.
3 marks
A healthcare worker was employed as a team manager in a fostering team. While working in this role, the team manager engaged in a number of activities which looked after children whose cases were allocated to team members of his team.
His actions included, taking a child to a football match; taking a child out for a meal; taking a number of children swimming; buying a child an Xbox; paying a child to clean a car; taking a child to his home address.
There were no professional reasons for any of these actions- they were not part of any care plan and had not been discussed with the allocated healthcare worker. The team manager did not record these actions in the relevant care files and did not inform his own manager about them.
Question 13 Learning Outcome: 22
Identify 3 problems in the above situations that breach a healthy professional relationship and result in professional misconduct.
3 x 1 marks
Question 14 Learning Outcome: 24
Using 3 examples, explain the significance and the potential consequences of the team manager’s failure to record his actions appropriately.
3 x 1 marks
Question 15 Learning Outcome: 23
Outline and explore 3 reasons how ineffective time management can have an impact on relationships in a healthcare setting.
3 x 1 marks
Many CETB Ireland learners find the 6N2207 Boundary Management Assignment challenging due to complex ethical scenarios, confidentiality limits, and strict question-by-question responses. Students often struggle to apply theory professionally without being judgemental, while also reflecting on personal effectiveness and learning. There’s no need to worry—Ireland Assignment Helper provides expert Boundary Management Assignment Help aligned fully with QQI and Cork ETB assessment guidelines. For trust and reassurance, you can also review assignment samples written by our healthcare and social care experts. Order today with ireland online assignment help and receive a fully customised, plagiarism-free, human-written 6N2207 assignment prepared only for you.
Get Free Assignment Quotes